Previous Page  6 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

Patagonia’s Pandora’s Box

Editor’s Letter

You have to give it up to Patagonia. It took real guts to back research sug-

gesting synthetic fibers in performance apparel may be contributing to a sig-

nificant microfiber pollution problem. There are few instances in the history

of corporate American when a large, well-known company so openly acknowl-

edged a potentially major issue with a component that goes into a substan-

tial amount of its product. And not just Patagonia product, the polyester, ny-

lon, acrylic, and rayon fibers prominent in the findings are deeply intertwined

into everything we have come to know about outdoor performance apparel.

Certainly, it’s not unprecedented for outdoor companies to take a stand for

the planet, far from it. Recent campaigns against long-chain DWR were very

important, and the pressure to humanize down production certainly ruffled

some feathers. Even so, market applications of both those components are but

slices in a much broader outdoor apparel product category that regularly utiliz-

es vast amounts of synthetic fibers. Of the 30 or so performance apparel items

in our semi-annual product showcase (page 42) that are likely to see the inside

of a washing machine, nearly all likely use some synthetic fiber. Make no mis-

take, Patagonia’s move is causing quiet shockwaves through the supply chain.

Granted, Patagonia knows any admittance isn’t going to suddenly crater

apparel sales; consumer change simply doesn’t happen that quickly. But it’s not

just Patagonia’s sales and marketing strategies and sacrifices that are of note.

Bigger to me is how Patagonia’s decision illuminates some tough realities for

all of us. After all, synthetic fibers are pervasive in outdoor apparel, everywhere

from socks to skull caps, base layer to jackets, water sports to winter mountain

activities. We love our synthetic fibers, and for some good reasons. But now we

also must acknowledge, according to the study, that “Recent evidence supports

microfiber pollution pervading terrestrial environments and the atmosphere as

well,” and that “microfibers are of particular concern regarding their potential

to transport hazardous chemicals into the environment.”

When assessing major global issues such as climate change and pollution,

it’s easy to point to the faceless villains: big oil, big energy, big politics, etc. But

after reading about the ties between performance apparel and microplastic

pollution, it’s hard for me not to visualize all those individual consumer washing

machines in all those individual homes and all those individual, single garments.

These pollutants, in other words, are literally coming right off our backs.

If nothing else, it is a clear reminder how the decisions we all make are

just as important as the changes we fight for in government regulations and

corporate practices. Likewise, it’s a stark reminder of how challenging it will

be to continue to reconcile our responsibilities as stewards of the planet while

at the same time relying on the continuous cycle of capitalistic consumption.

After all, until our processes, components and delivery mechanism are all

completely sustainable or neutral, logic says it’s typically better ecologically

not to buy than to drive to the store and buy. That’s not always conducive

to a successful and healthy “industry.”

It may sound disheartening, but only if hope is left in the box. Patagonia

could air its dirty laundry because it apparently believes, as I do, that its

employees, providers and partners can and will find solutions. Patagonia

also knows, as I do, that outdoor vendors, retailers and their consumers are

routinely on the forefront of sustainability movements. That’s why, time and

time again, the outdoor market is routinely treated as proving grounds for

earth-friendly and socially conscious start-ups.

Things aren’t going to get easier. The microfiber pollution problem

shows we have a lot of work to do and some gut checks to endure on the

way to becoming a truly clean industry. Patagonia’s leaders deserves credit

for willingly facing those facts.

MV

Martin Vilaboy

Editor-in-Chief

martin@bekapublishing.com

Percy Zamora

Art Director

outdoor@bekapublishing.com

Ernest Shiwanov

Editor at Large

ernest@bekapublishing.com

Berge Kaprelian

Group Publisher

berge@bekapublishing.com

Rene Galan

Account Executive

rene@bekapublishing.com

Miki Takeuchi

Digital Media

Jennifer Vilaboy

Production Director

Beka Publishing

Berge Kaprelian

President and CEO

Neil Ende

General Counsel

Jim Bankes

Business Accounting

Corporate Headquarters

745 N. Gilbert Road

Suite 124, PMB 303

Gilbert, AZ 85234

Voice: 480.503.0770

Fax: 480.503.0990

Email:

berge@bekapublishing.com

© 2016 Beka Publishing, All rights reserved.

Reproduction in whole or in any form or

medium without express written permission

of Beka Publishing, is prohibited. Inside

Outdoor and the Inside Outdoor logo are

trademarks of Beka Publishing

Inside

Outdoor

|

Summer

2016

6