Previous Page  39 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

ronmental upside potential is worth

a critical look despite the downsides,

which tend to be the high cost of set-

up, minimum order quantities, incom-

patibility with protein-based fibers

and limited color availability.

This is precisely where

e.dye

dif-

ferentiates itself in the solution dye

space.

E.dye

has invested in its own

pilot factory to prove that this technolo-

gy can be brought into the mainstream

in the outdoor segment.

“We have produced 3,800 colors,

and we have virtually no color mini-

mum because we control the indus-

trial process,” Murphy explains. This

alone will help bring solution dyeing’s

barrier-to-entry within reach of a larger

audience of environmentally and cost-

conscious manufacturers.

As good as this sounds, how does

solution dye color compare with tra-

ditional piece dyeing? The finished

products are indistinguishable side-

by-side. Solution dye performance is

without compromise with

e.dye

adding

yet another twist to the process. The

issue of color fidelity has always been

a long-standing problem in the dye

industry.

E.dye

resolves the problem

by using a proprietary color matching

and prediction system, the basis for its

intellectual property. The company for-

mulated its own color recipes in master

batches, essentially creating a unique,

reproducible, library of color standards.

This is in stark contrast to piece

dyeing houses where color matching

is ideally a best guess.

E.dye

’s In-

novation Center in Kunshan, China,

ensures color curves and physical

samples produced in-house meet client

specifications. For designers, buying a

stock yarn color from

e.dye

saves time

and money, but according to Murphy,

half opt for custom solutions. If there is

a match and the colorant exists, says

Murphy, it only takes three to four days

to create a new recipe.

So

e.dye

’s solution dye process

appears to check all the performance

boxes for the actual yarn dyeing step.

What about the rest of the downstream

textile process? Is there any water

used after leaving

e.dye

or a licensed

partner’s plant? “We make no claims

about water use after yarn production,”

Murphy responds. “We advise our mill

partners and encourage (best manu-

facturing practices). Some water is

normally used in scouring.”

Therefore, how do the two com-

peting dye technologies stack up?

Neither Drydye’s supercritical CO2

nor

e.dye

’s solution dye process use

any water during the dyeing phase.

That is a positive step knowing how

resource exhaustive and polluting

traditional piece dyeing is. Yet cir-

cling back to Figure 1, it is just one

step of many in the textile manufac-

turing process, several of which use

lots of water, chemical treatments

and energy. All of which negatively

impact the communities surrounding

the textile industrial areas. Their wa-

ter supplies, water treatment and air

quality are all under duress.

Realistically, it is going to take years

of collaborations before textile manufac-

turing will match the level of clean Dry-

dye and

e.dye

has brought to the textile

process. Yet if the most egregious part

of the textile process can be scrubbed,

so can the rest.

APPAREL

SOURCING &

PRODUCTION

INDIA

VIETNAM

CHINA

HONG KONG

USA

Quickfeat

produces

sweaters, knits, wovens

outerwear, activewear,

leather, swim and

organics.

Our Services

- Fabric Sourcing

- Trim Sourcing

- Garment Development

- Factory Sourcing

- Production

- Quality Control

- Packing & Logistics

541 350 1615

Marketing O ice

Bend, Oregon USA

info@quickfeat.com | www.quickfeat.com

SUMMER

2017

|

Inside

Outdoor

39